<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election Recap- LGBT Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomascwaters.com/2009/11/04/election-2009-lgbt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomascwaters.com/2009/11/04/election-2009-lgbt/</link>
	<description>The Source for Queer News, Info, and Commentary in Pennsylvania</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 09:50:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategies Towards Marriage Equality &#124; thomascwaters.com</title>
		<link>http://thomascwaters.com/2009/11/04/election-2009-lgbt/comment-page-1/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategies Towards Marriage Equality &#124; thomascwaters.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomascwaters.com/?p=2956#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>[...] few of the things I felt the broader GLBTQ community would need to look at when I talked about the election 2009 results last week, but if you don&#8217;t go back and read that post, here they are in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few of the things I felt the broader GLBTQ community would need to look at when I talked about the election 2009 results last week, but if you don&#8217;t go back and read that post, here they are in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tcwaters</title>
		<link>http://thomascwaters.com/2009/11/04/election-2009-lgbt/comment-page-1/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>tcwaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomascwaters.com/?p=2956#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>Posted to Twitter by @LegalMoose:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@tcwaters Interesting summary. BTW, DC locally will approve same-sex marriage. The sole wild card is the mandatory Congressional review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted to Twitter by @LegalMoose:</p>
<p>@tcwaters Interesting summary. BTW, DC locally will approve same-sex marriage. The sole wild card is the mandatory Congressional review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tcwaters</title>
		<link>http://thomascwaters.com/2009/11/04/election-2009-lgbt/comment-page-1/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>tcwaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomascwaters.com/?p=2956#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>Posted to Twitter by @LegalMoose:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@tcwaters Interesting summary. BTW, DC locally will approve same-sex marriage. The sole wild card is the mandatory Congressional review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted to Twitter by @LegalMoose:</p>
<p>@tcwaters Interesting summary. BTW, DC locally will approve same-sex marriage. The sole wild card is the mandatory Congressional review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

