2009 in Review: Trans Issues

Now, until the end of the year, I am going to post a series of “Year In Review” posts, highlighting the stories and posts that received the most traffic or interest on my blog. Today, I’m starting with #9 and will work my way up to #1.

#6 “T” is for Trans

I have written much about Trans issues over the past year, often, finding myself in hot water, especially with a group of Transexuals from New Zealand, I believe. And I’m not the only one. Over at the Bilerico Project, things really turned into a mess after the editorial board allowed a post that was very offensive to Trans people to be published. While the original post was really bad, the chaos caused and the vitriol that ensued was unwarranted. People are entitled to their own opinions and entitled to share those opinions. But these situations and many more over the year demonstrate the gulf of misunderstanding that exists between most of the LGB and the T communities.

Unlike yesterday’s post on Religious Freedom, I want to keep this one short, and direct you to a post by Jessica on another blog. Specifically, she is responding to comments made by Tim Pawlenty, and they go a long ways to illustrating some of the issues faced by Trans people, especially MTF. A link to her blog is below, and it is great reading.

I haven’t yet written about Marriage Equality in this year end review (it is coming up in the next few days) but one of the reasons I have been opposed to a hyper focus on marriage equality, is because it doesn’t serve the whole of the GLBTQ communities. States like New Hampshire allow same-sex marriage but also allow a trans person to be refused housing or denied a job. Equality sounds good, but does it make everyone equal?

I remember during my earliest involvement in activism (1976 Columbus Ohio) the struggle over naming our organization. What started at the OGRC (Ohio Gay Rights Coalition) became the OGLRC, as we discussed and came to understand how vital it was to name those who are disenfranchized, until today, when we are left with a pink alphabet soup of letters to describe the who of our collective communities. The “T” has been included for a while, but I wonder if it has been included without any real understanding of what “T” means or includes, or what the issues are that matter most to those who identify as Trans.

I also wonder if there isn’t disagreement within the broadest  understanding of what Trans includes. In what became the longest comment thread on my blog, a number of trans women tried to educate me about Trans issues. The post and comment thread is also linked below. One of the main elements of it however, was the desire by some of the commenters to differentiate between transexual and transgender, and in their view, transgenders were people for whom it was a lifestyle thing, like cross dressing. Another commenter went so far as to say that the gay movement (in the generic sense) should not include Trans, because for those who are intersex, it is simply a medical condition, and they have a better chance of receiving the treatment and acceptance needed without the gay community. I don’t personally know a lot of Trans people, but of those I know, not a single one would agree with that position. My take on it all, is that we (in the most general sense) have a lot of work ahead of us to better understand Trans, and the women and men who identify this way. Without this understanding we can not really move towards full equality.

Here is Jessica’s post on Light Up My… blog

Some of my posts about Trans over the year:

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/12/15/gender/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/10/26/ftm-transgender/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/10/15/transgender/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/09/30/reading-yes-how-about-kalamazoo/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/09/17/violation-and-caster-semenya/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/09/02/dci-to-unravel-transgender-and-intersex-issues-in-new-media/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/08/28/transohio-symposium-shatters-new-ground-for-midwest-transpeople/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/08/02/theology-and-transgender/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/07/27/a-native-american-perspective-on-the-theory-of-gender-continuum-by-drk/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/07/16/why-pa-hb-300-must-remain-transgender-inclusive/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/06/19/trans-blogging/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/06/05/you-can-marry-but-you-cant-work/

http://thomascwaters.com/2009/05/21/reply-to-tina/

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

  • tcwaters

    Sorry I didn't respond quicker. I'd be honored to be in your blog roll and add you to mine as well.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jessica-Dickens/1509032508 Jessica Dickens

    Excellent reply, Thomas. Thanks so much for your time (and cogency!). If it's alright with you, I'm going to list you on my blogroll as I think you have some really excellent things to say.

  • tcwaters

    You make great points, and I so totally agree with you. A few thoughts more abouyt the Bilerico episode. The fact that the editors blew it is another example of how much we GLBTQ! people don't know each other enough. And also, the level of anger that was expressed is illustrative of just how much anger and resentment has built up over time. Recognizing both is so critical for our collective movement to recognize and understand.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jessica-Dickens/1509032508 Jessica Dickens

    Thomas–

    I think every point in your reply is spot on. I stayed out of the comments on Bilerico intentionally, not wanting to get enmeshed on what was shaping up to be a flamewar by comment #5. When things break down that quickly, the good comments get lost in the burn, and it's the profanity and name calling that gets attention, not the attempts to transform the situation into a teachable moment. I think Zoe Brain has done an excellent job doing just that with Ron Gold over this particular blowup.

    I absolutely agree that the editors should have handled things differently, and I also agree that their failure to do so doesn't make them transphobes. It smacks a little too much of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, at least for me. Something my brother said to me the last I spoke to him just came to mind: we had been talking, he called me by my old name several times, and I admit that I got a little angry and frustrated with him. We don't talk much, especially since I've transitioned, and while I was getting angry and feeling like he's as much a lost cause as my parents, I think he just honestly didn't get how upset he was making me. I have a feeling that something similar happened here: we're so used to our genders being invisiblized (if I just made up a new word, I'd love to take credit for it), that when it happens within what we consider to be a safe space I think the tendency is just to fly off the handle– we're expecting from others what we maybe haven't set as a ground rule, and take out on the unsuspecting all the anger and frustration and fear that's come our way from the real bigots.

    From your OP, I think you make a good point that the “T” in the LGB community tends to be misunderstood a lot. As trans people, many (but by no means all) of us identify within the heteronormative gender binary, and once we transition we really stop being activists (there's a joke I've heard about trans activists having a three to five year life span) as we often gain in passing privilege and there's not as pressing a need to fight for our rights. If people assume we are cisgender, we aren't automatically treated badly by others, so the need to fight for our rights as trans people become less and less important. I think our willingness to blend in and to leave our brothers and sisters that are pre- or mid-transition behind must seem a little like sharks that turn on and eat their siblings, at least to some people on the outside.

    Despite the differences and misunderstandings however, trans people can be (and oftentimes are) belittled in a lot of the same ways that LGB people, and I always say that we are natural political allies: LGBT people are all poorly regarded in the US health care system, we all face a lot of discrimination in our daily lives (the conflation of LGB and T being such that I was most frequently called a faggot in high school: I'm guessing that just being called a girl wasn't enough of an insulting epithet), our relationships are belittled and trans people such as myself that go from being (perceptibly) straight to (perceptibly) gay have a lot of the same relationship issues that LGB people have: can I file my taxes jointly, do we get survivor benefits, will this medical power of attorney document suffice if we have to go to the ER?

    With so much in common, I absolutely agree that the proper thing is to increase dialog, not to cut it short. If the LGB people that are closest to us (politically and otherwise) don't fully understand our situation, then how can we expect them to really go to bat for us when the chips are down on a(n) (non-)inclusive ENDA? The fact that trans people aren't frequently lifelong activists just makes it that much harder to establish good long term working relationships with people who would. It makes it harder for us to have good representation on the most powerful groups like the HRC and then we all bitch and wonder why we don't have any trans people up in the top positions.

    I'm not trying to blame the victims, either. I just think that respect is a two way street, and trying to agree with you that the proper response to Ron Gold was a reasoned rebuttal (which Zoe, God bless her, is trying to do), not a quickly typed insult about how he's nothing but a transphobe. We need to help people understand, and while we don't always feel like doing that, we aren't at a point yet where it's unnecessary. While we can't always expect people to immediately understand the unfamiliar, I think we can be thankful to have rational people on our side so that we're not always going it alone. So thanks for that.

  • tcwaters

    Thanks for the comment Jessica! To answer your question, I use a Google Alert for “Bathroom Bill” and that is how I came across your blog.

    Some thoughts about the Bilerico stuff. Yes, I totally understand that making a person's identity invisible is infuriating.I guess where I felt it become out of control was in the comments that labeled all of Bilerico as transphobic, because one ignorant person said something highly offensive. Perhaps I'll never really “get it” as I am not trans, I think I would have looked at the number of people who wrote negatively to the post as a good thing. I think the TBP made a few critical errors: 1) The post was not prefaced with a disclaimer, that stated that the editors felt that this post could be controversial, but in the interest of dialogue were posting it; 2) They didn't require the post to be rewritten from the 1st person. Gold's piece was written as if what he was saying was fact instead of his opinion, and he offered no substantiating material to support his basic premises (which were so flawed it wasn't funny) . A project writer may be able to post anything they want, but they should also be encouraged to cite evidence or material that would support their ideas; 3) TBP should have asked a Trans poster to write a rebuttal that was posted at the same time as the post, and then encouraged readers to respectfully discuss the issues being put out; 4) The post and the comments should not have been pulled off of the site. While this may have removed the original offensive post, it also silenced everyone who had spoked out against what Gold had written.

    I think I do really get your point. I just believe that the only way we will educate those who hold views like Gold's is for there to be more dialogue, and not less. Gold's ideas were offensive and have no basis in reality. Yet putting it out there created an opportunity for real ideas about real people to be shared and opinions changed. When the discourse shifts to You are transphobic (as opposed to what you said is offensive and wrong) so quickly, there is little room for the needed dialogue. I do not mean to fail to see nor appreciate the reality of anyone's hurt or anger.

    I hope my readers took the time to read your blog and to follow you. If we are to strengthen the whole of the LGBTQ communities and work together, it will only happen as gays , lesbians and bi's start to really learn about and understand Trans women and men.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jessica-Dickens/1509032508 Jessica Dickens

    Thomas–
    Thanks so much for pimping me out to your readers. If you don't mind me asking, I'm wondering how you came across me; care to divulge your sources? ;-)

    I'm sorry to hear that you've been having some trouble with trans issues this year– your posts have seemed only respectful to me, but maybe I missed the ones that upset the people you referenced.

    Not that I'm defending the vitriol from Bilerico-gate, but it makes a lot more sense to me why trans people got as upset as they did– a rejection of a trans identity is a rejection of the trans gender which in turn is a rejection of the person.

    Our identities are so caught up in our genders that we always express things in gendered ways– it's one of the first things that comes up if you meet someone new and they're a little androgynous. As soon as that person gets out of earshot, it's always is that a guy or a girl? And it's not always meant to be rude, either.

    Just a few weeks ago, I had a young girl at our church ask me whether I was a boy or girl. I had transitioned in that church, and she knew me, or knew of me at least, when I was still living as a man. So I told her that my name was Jessica and that I was a girl. Satisfied with the answer, she ran off to play with her friends.

    When I was mid-transition, prior to hormones, I looked really bad. It was the stereotypical “man-in-a-dress” thing that we all hate, but inevitably have to go through. Being androgynous, and I looked really androgynous, got me stared at. People would laugh in public making no effort to be subtle. It was humiliating, but underscored something very plain– gender is really important, not just to the person experiencing it, but to the people who witness it.

    The point of my drawn out comment (I promise I have one!) is that our experiences of gender are vital to our understanding of who we are. Our gender is vital to the understanding of others about who we are. Ron Gold's post on Bilerico denied the existence of trans genders, calling us deluded and mutilated, instead of trying to wrap his head around the fact that a person could be so upset about the body they have that they'd go to the extreme position of modifying it through hormones and surgery in order to make it fit better with their own internal identity. That Gold didn't pause to consider the idea that maybe trans people understand themselves better than he does is what upset so many of us (or at least me).

    I'm not saying that you don't understand any of that, as it seems like you must, but that trans people take it really personally when you attack the notion of transgender because that calls into question the “notion” of our own gendered experiences. (The scare quotes there are to emphasize that for a trans person, our gendered experiences are not the product of delusion, but a real thing that causes us real pain and depression throughout so much of our lives. It's not just a notion. It's one of the solid tangibles in our lives.)

    Again, not that I'm trying to justify the spite that was directed at Ron Gold as a result of his post at Bilerico, just that the feelings of those trans people are real and legitimate– they were hurt and that is a real thing. Should they have waited to cool down a little before commenting, going back to edit out the profanity? Absolutely. Does that mean that they aren't entitled to feel pissed off? By no means.

    What I hope I can accomplish by this comment is to add just one inch to the bridge over the divide that currently separates the GLB from the T. I think you do marvelous work, and I cannot express how much I appreciate your efforts to increase the understanding between all people in the bowl of pink alphabet soup (I love that phrase, and will make a point of giving you credit for it every time I use it).