Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Pennsylvania’

PA Senate Judiciary Committee to Vote on SB 707

March 11th, 2010 View Comments

It appears that the PA Senate Judiciary Committee will be taking up John Eichelberger’s SB 707 which would amend the PA constitution, writing discrimination into it. The bill would essentially change nothing except that the ban on same-sex marriage would be built directly into the constitution. The language of the bill would define marriage as between one man and one woman. Backers of the legislation believe that this will make it harder to overturn in the courts, but this really isn’t the case. There are states that have had a constitutional ban, and it has been found as unconstitutional just as easily as a simple law of the state.

The real motivation however, is simply to make LGBT people feel unwelcome and unwanted in Pennsylvania by pushing a religiously motivated position forward. Twice before conservatives have placed this issue before the Legislature, and twice before it has been defeated. If we are to defeat it again, we will need your help!

At this point, the single most important thing you can do is mail (as in the good old postal mail) a short letter to each member of the Judiciary committee asking them to vote against this bill so that it is not introduced to the full Senate. Links to each member of the committee is below. Because the vote may be next week, it is imperative to do this TODAY!  You may send the same letter to everyone on the committee, but it is important that it isn’t just a form letter that all you did was sign. Take 10 minutes, and draft 250- 500 words explaining why you do not want to see this discrimination added to the state’s constitution. It is useful to say something about how this will impact you and your loved ones.

The time and money invested to write a short letter, get some stamps and mail these today can make the difference between this bill progressing further or being killed in committee. This is worth it!

Senators are much like you. They receive a ton of junk mail and form letters, and even their staff doesn’t have time to read everything. But a personal letter with your real signature on it is something that will definitely be read directly by the senator. I have been told that a senator that receives as few as 4 or 5 handwritten letters sees this as a reason to consider the request, where as receiving a thousand emails won’t.

Ask your friends, neighbors and loved ones to do the same. Have a letter-writing party this evening!

If you write a letter, and feel free sharing it, post it here to the blog as a comment. This can encourage and remind others to write their letters.

Members of the committee:Officers

Greenleaf, Stewart J. , Chair

White, Mary Jo, Vice Chair

Leach, Daylin , Minority Chair

Scarnati, Joseph B., III, ex-officio

Majority

Browne, Patrick M.

Earll, Jane M.

Gordner, John R.

Orie, Jane Clare

Piccola, Jeffrey E.

Rafferty, John C., Jr.



If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

Why Pennsylvania Needs to Care About Non-Discrimination

March 10th, 2010 View Comments

The linked story below is actually about the state of Virginia where the current Attorney General is trying to deny LGBT’s rights, and the Governor has come out issuing an order against discrimination. Here is a clip from the story:

One thing having an impact is that Northrup Grumman is looking to relocate its headquarters to the DC metro area.  The company has a clear non-discrimination policy and offers benefits to domestic partners.  People in Maryland were using Cuccinelli’s approach on the issue to try to get the company to disqualify Virginia as a location.

Does Pennsylvania want to be attracting large corporations like Northrup Grumman? Seems like a silly question, yet the reality is that companies make choices based on a number of factors, bit at least a part of it, is selecting states and locations consistent with their internal policies regarding non-discrimination and domestic partnership benefits.

Wake up Pennsylvania! We are already slipping behind and are less competitive than many other states, stop that decline and bring companies and jobs to our state by making Pennsylvania a state free from discrimination in housing, employment, and public accommodations. Pass PA HB 300, and stop discriminatory legislation such as SB 707!

via Daily Kos: BREAKING – Gov. McDonnell separates from AG, issues order against discrimination.

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

PA Senate March Madness

March 8th, 2010 View Comments

I have always liked the alliteration, March Madness, even though I’m not a basketball fan, so I decided to use it for this post in describing what may happen in the PA Senate this month. Earlier, State Senator John Eichelberger introduced SB 707, a bill that would ammend the PA constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman, and now, in March, this bill may be up for a vote by the Judiciary committee. Pure madness- this is just crazy legislation for the Senate to be spending any time on at this point in time.

The state already prohibits same-sex marriage with a DOMA type law passed a number of years ago. With the economy still struggling, so many people out of work, and the budget negotiation process about to begin, why devote any time at all to a bill that does not do anything to help the state move forward, or address the key issues facing the state at this time?

The point of this legislation is not marriage or the prohibition of same-sex marriage. The point of it is the amendment of the PA constitution, and to do so in a way that produces benefit to no one in any way. Patterned loosely on what was done in California, those who are opposed to equality for gays and lesbians see such a move as important in their battle. But as Pennsylvanians, what is important to us? Putting time , energy, and resources into a bill that will produces nothing tangibly positive for the people of the state, or the proliferation of a conceptual argument? It might be different if it looked as if the PA DOMA was threatened, but there are no court cases pending or planned to challenge the PA law. There is no need embed this into the PA constitution.

If you want our Senate to be working to put people back to work if you want our lawmakers to set Pennsylvania up as a leader in clean energy; if you want our elected officials to pass a budget on-time, tell the members of the Judiciary committee to ignore this bill at this time, and look at the priorities of the state.

Here is a list of the members of the Judiciary committee. Take a few moments and compose a short letter, and then send a copy of it to each of them. In it, say something about why you don’t want them to waste time on this bill. You can email it to them, but it is more likely to be actually read if you mail it via snail mail. Take a few more minutes and call their offices, and leave a message, asking them to set this bill aside and turn their attention to more important issues.

http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/cteeInfo/cteeInfo.cfm?cde=19&body=S

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

Categories: general Tags: , ,

Writing Discrimination Into the PA Constitution

January 29th, 2010 View Comments

Harrisburg, PA – Tuesday, January 26, 2010, State Senator John H. Eichelberger, Jr. formally introduced Senate Bill 707, a joint resolution to amend the Pennsylvania Constitution to include the definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman…

If you are a regular reader of my blog, you know that while I’m all for Marriage Equality, when it comes to Pennsylvania, it is low on my list of issues to work towards. In a state where a person can be fired for simply being gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered, what is the value of having gay marriage? The simple act of applying for a marriage license could place many people across the state in jeopardy of losing their jobs, being denied housing or public accommodations. but for me, this move by Senator Eichelberger isn’t really about gay marriage. At it’s core, it is all about writing discrimination into the PA constitution, and that is just plain wrong!

Now, the reason they want to write discrimination into the constitution, is in the hopes of slowing down any progress towards marriage equality. I almost wrote “killing the possibility of marriage equality.” But we know from looking at other states, that when brought before the courts, constitutional bans are seen as unconstitutional. So, in the end, even if this makes it into the constitution, at some point farther down the road, it will be found to be unconstitutional, and will eventually be overturned. but when and at what cost, both in literal dollars and other ways?

Opponents to same-sex marriage claim that whenever this issue is put up to a vote by the people it loses. That is not really a fair statement. A more accurate statement is this: Whenever same-sex marriage is put up for a vote by the people, opponents can launch a campaign of fear mongering, lies and misinformation that is successful at scaring people to vote “No”

Pennsylvania already has a law that bans same-sex marriage. Is there really a need at this time to go farther and write discrimination into the PA Constitution? Is this what we want our senators and representatives spending their time on in Harrisburg? Is this the state we want to see for our children, our families, our friends and our neighbors? As a state, we already see young people leaving in droves, moving to other places across the country where they have a better chance at a full and happy life. Do we really want to continue to push people away by stepping back in time and embracing discrimination?

The following 15 state senators are co-sponsors of the PA Marriage Amendment! Join me by calling them and asking them to remove their sponsorship from this legislation.

  • Sen. Richard Alloway: 717-264-6100
  • Sen. Michael Brubaker: 717-627-0036
  • Sen. Jake Corman: 814-355-0477
  • Sen. John Eichelberger (Lead sponsor): 814-695-8386
  • Sen. Edwin Erickson: 610-853-4100
  • Sen. Mike Folmer: 717-274-6735
  • Sen. John Gordner: 570-784-3464
  • Sen. Richard Kasunic: 724-626-1611
  • Sen. Bob Mensch: 215-529-1215
  • Sen. Raphael Musto: 570-654-1483
  • Sen. Jeffrey Piccola: 717-896-7714
  • Sen. Robert Robbins: 724-588-1323
  • Sen. Joseph Scarnati: 814-726-7201
  • Sen. Lloyd Smucker: 717-397-1309
  • Sen. Donald White: 724-357-0151
  • Sen. Gene Yaw: 570-322-6457

via Senator Eichelberger.

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

Equality Advocates Pennsylvania Commends Senator Casey and Senator Specter

August 5th, 2009 View Comments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

August 5, 2009

Equality Advocates Pennsylvania Commends Senator Casey and Senator Specter for Co-Sponsoring an Inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act

Philadelphia, PA - Today, Equality Advocates Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania’s largest statewide lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) advocacy organization, applauded Pennsylvania Senators Casey and Specter for co-sponsoring an inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender employees from workplace discrimination. The bill, which enjoys bipartisan support in Congress, would add sexual orientation and gender identity to existing federal employment non-discrimination laws. This bill was introduced by Senators Jeff Merkley (OR-D), Susan Collins (ME-R), and Edward M. Kennedy (MA-D).

“Workplace protections for LGBT people are urgently needed and long overdue,” said Jake Kaskey, Policy and Outreach Coordinator for Equality Advocates Pennsylvania. “The President has said he is ready to sign this bill. All we need now is for the Senate to act.”

Currently, 12 states and more than 100 localities have LGBT-inclusive nondiscrimination protections, covering nearly 40 percent of Americans. And, according to numerous surveys, large majorities of likely voters in the U.S. support federal employment non-discrimination laws to protect LGBT people. Pennsylvania State Representatives are currently debating House Bill 300, an amendment to the state’s Human Relations Act that would prohibit discrimination against LGBT people in employment, housing, and public accommodations.  Earlier this session, House Bill 300 was voted successfully out of the State Government Committee, the first-ever vote this legislation has received in Pennsylvania’s history. Polling from 2007 shows a majority of Pennsylvanians from every ideology, region, political party, and age supporting this type of legislation.

Equality Advocates Pennsylvania continues to work with organizations and individuals across Pennsylvania to not only pass this important federal legislation, but also show the need for a state law that protects all Pennsylvanians from discrimination.

“We urge Congress to take speedy action to put this bill on the President’s desk,” said Kaskey. “LGBT employees work just as hard and contribute just as much as other workers. They should not have to fear losing their jobs simply because of their sexual orientation or gender identity or expression.”

For more information about ENDA, or for Pennsylvanians to send an e-mail to Senator Casey and Senator Specter thanking them for co-sponsoring this bill, visit: http://eqfed.org/campaign/endaintro_senate_equalitypa/.  For more information about Equality Advocates Pennsylvania, visit http//equalitypa.org.

###

Equality Advocates Pennsylvania is dedicated to achieving equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Pennsylvanians through direct legal services, education and policy reform.

Jake Kaskey

Policy and Outreach Coordinator

Equality Advocates Pennsylvania

1211 Chestnut Street Suite 605

Philadelphia, PA 19107

(215) 731-1447 ext. 14 (o)

(215) 407-5313 (m)

(215) 731-1544 (f)

jkaskey@equalitypa.org

http://equalitypa.org

Join us on facebook!  http://tinyurl.com/equalitypa

Support Equality Advocates Pennsylvania:

United Way SE PA Workplace Giving: 12398

Facebook Causes:  http://tinyurl.com/equalitypacauses

Paypal: http://tinyurl.com/supportequalitypa

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

Mennonite Group Slams Eichelberger For Gay Comments

July 14th, 2009 View Comments

This is from the Pennsylvania Progressive, a wonderful blog. A few days old, but a very good read. In it, is a letter from Carol Wise, Executive Director of the Brethren Mennonite Council for LGBT Interests. I especially appreciate this:

Senator Eichelberger comes from a Christian denomination that, while not supportive of marriage equality, specifically calls upon its members to “challenge openly the widespread fear, hatred and harassment of homosexual persons” as well as “advocate the right to jobs, housing and legal justice.” It is disheartening to hear his disregard of such directives by calling gay and lesbian relationships “dysfunctional;” by his casual dismissal of the needs of the children of lesbian and gay couples; and especially by his disturbing comment that gay and lesbian people are “allowed to exist,” as though our very lives depend upon his generosity.

What I appreciate most is the complexity and reality of it. This denomination is not one that actively supports marriage equality, but still calls its members to challenge…” This,  is a reality that is so often left out of the dialogue by those who suggest that all religious fall on the side opposing rights for GLBTQ citizens.

Eichelberber’s comments are hurtful and dismissive of all GLBTQ’s and are not limited to the issue of Marriage Equality, even though that is the disguise for his bigotry.

The Pennsylvania Progressive:: Mennonite Group Slams Eichelberger For Gay Comments .

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

Time to lean on Leanna (and all PA Senators)

June 21st, 2009 View Comments

While I was away over the weekend, there were a number of bloggers who wrote about thew recent debate between PA State Senators, Daylin Leach and John Eichelberger (R- PA 30th). Two very good resources would be the Pennsylvania Progressive blog, as well as Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents blog. I have linked to the blog below however, to share another voice on the matter.

I want to highlight just one element out of the debate. This quote from Eichelberger:

We’re allowing them to exist and do what every American can do. We’re just not rewarding them with any special designation.

As you read it, pause on the phrase “we’re allowing them to exist…” and ponder changing the reference of them from Gays and Lesbians, to Blacks, Jews, American Indians, Immigrants… whatever group you want.

Could the bigotry of any legislation that denies full equality to the GLBTQ communities be any more flagrant? In addition to ponder the following:

  • Who is the “we” about whom Eichelberger is speaking?  The state government? Straight people?  Tax payers? Only straight taxpayers?
  • What is the alternative to “allowing them to exist?” This phrase implies that this action is by choice and decision. If one allows one can also disallow.
  • The issue being discussed is marriage equality. Eichelberger’s bill would add a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage for Pennsylvania, where as Leach’s bill would allow full marriage equality for gay and lesbian couples. So, what is the “special designation” to which Eichelberger is referring? If anything, marriage as it exists today, grants a special designation to straight people who marry. How exactly would allowing full civil marriage equality provide for any special designation?

A constitutional ban on gay marriage has been defeated within the state twice before. With the budget crisis, and the other issues facing Pennsylvanians, isn’t it time for all of our Senators to stand up against such bigotry, and say enough is enough.

Unleashed: Time to lean on Leanna.

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

Pennsylvania Marriage Equality Debate on WHYY Friday AM

June 18th, 2009 View Comments

Sue Kerr wrote an awesome blog post today about the upcoming debate between Daylin Leach and John Eichelberger. Leach has introduced a Marriage Equality bill in the PA Senate and Eichelberger is the author of the Marriage Protection Act, which is really a bill to keep marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Check out what she has to say, it is good stuff.

From my perspective, the “damage” from a Marriage Equality bill isn’t “the inevitable rightwing backlash harming HB 300,” as Sue suggests, but rather 2 other points.

1) The Marriage Equality bill speaks to the needs of only a part of the GLBTQ communities. It has meaning for gay couples and lesbian couples, but accomplishes nothing for single people, nothing for protections for bisexual or transgenders within Pennsylvania.

2) It shifts the focus of activists and GLBTQ’s within the state. This diverting of time, energy, talent and resources away from HB 300 towards another endeavor wll have a negative impact on HB 300 which provides protections for all Pennsylvanians including GLBTQ’s and even straights. Daylin Leach has suggested that a Marriage equality bill would actually help PA HB 300 by providing legislators with a bill that appears more “mainstream” and therefor easier for some to vote for. With a Marriage Equality bill at one extreme end, and a constitutional ban against gay marriage at the other extreme end, PA HB 300 ends up in the middle. I can agree with this thinking to some degree. I also applaud the Senator, no matter what his motivations, for bringing greater dialogue to the table on GLBTQ issues. And, Marriage Equality is civil right I believe we deserve (even if I don’t think now is the best time to be pushing for it.) Because the PA Senate is Republican controlled, I have no idea how far Leach’s bill can get (although IMHO that isn’t any reason not to move ahead). But I worry that PA could follow some New England states such as New Hampshire, where gay marriage is legal, but transpersons have no protection in employment, housing and public accommodations.

I would like to see the framing of the discourse about PA HB shifted. Yes, it is about Civil Rights. Yes, it provides most protections to gay lesbian, bisexual and transfolk. But it goes further by offering protection based on gender expression. Flamboyant men and butch women, even those who are straight, (and yes, they do exist) are protected by this bill. It is at it’s base, an economic bill that assist Pennsylvania be competitive in today’s difficult economic times, as companies make choices of where to locate headquarters, plants and other resources based upon the quality of life that their employees will find.

The debate on Friday, sounds like it will be a good thing, and I  look forward to how this dialogue continues.

Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents :: Pennsylvania Marriage Equality Debate on WHYY Friday AM.

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

Reply to H about lobbying your representative

June 16th, 2009 View Comments

The other day, I received a question in the form of a comment to the blog, and wanted to reply with an answer. Here was the comment:

Hi Tom, Cool blog. I’ve been checking it out for awhile and seeing you at Pride reminded me to take another look. I wonder if you would post advice for those of us who live in Pgh in areas where elected officials are supportive of HB300 and other GLBT initiatives. I send them notes to thank them for their support, but otherwise wouldn’t lobby them at this point because they are already on board. I’ve been told that officials don’t care much to hear from people who are not their constituents… so I’m not sure about lobbying officials who do not represent my neighborhood. Given all of this, what can I do to be more politically active? Thanks. H

Awesome question and one really worth talking about! Let me preface by saying this is just my opinion- others may feel differently, and perhaps we can get some dialogue going via comments to this post to highlight other ideas as well.

“More politically active” can mean a lot of different things, and defining some of them may seem like the way to start, but rather, I’m going to start at the other end of your question- the part about legislative lobbying for those in Pittsburgh. There are so many things going on, that I think there is something for anyone to do no matter where they live. I want to preface the rest of this post by organizing issues/legislation:

1) Allegheny County Nondiscrimination Ordinance. There is work to do here for everyone who lives in Allegheny County, although hopefully we are close to the end of this struggle. If your county representative is Amanda Green, there isn’t much to do- no need to contact her, but for any other representative, a phone call or an email is good. I believe the vote may be scheduled for this week, and I’m told this will pass, but until it does, we need to stay on top of this.

2) PA State-wide Constitutional Ban on Gay Marriage. There isn’t too much to do here, yet, but a letter to your State Senator isn’t a bad idea. This has been shot down twice before, so it is easy to think we will shoot it down again, but we may have much work to do on this later, so be prepared. but other matters are currently more pressing.

3) PA State-wide Marriage Equality. This was introduced by Senator Daylin Leach. There are a number of diverse opinions on this. Some feel that it takes energy and focus away from PA HB 300. The Senator believes it will be helpful to A HB 300. While the idea of Marriage Equality in PA is a great idea, it is hard to imagine how this bill introduced into the Republican controlled state senate will do very well. Time will tell. Because the state budget is the biggest push right now in Harrisburg, there most likely isn’t much to do on this at the moment.

4) PA HB 300. I left this to last, because it is in my opinion the most important piece of legislation after the Allegheny County ordinance. After the ordinance, because passing the county ordinance will help pass the state bill. I have written much about why I feel this bill is so crucial, so I won’t say much about that except that this bill provides protection for everyone in PA. That is everyone- meaning there isn’t a group of people, not touched by this bill including straight people, Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgenders.

There is an easy 2- part conditional here to decide what you need to do:

A) If your state representative is NOT Dan Frankel, make a visit to go see your state representative.

B) If your state representative is Dan Frankel. support your friends to do choice “A.”

So, let’s talk for a minute about these two. This suggests that the representatives are divided into two groups- Dan Frankel being one group and all the other representatives in the other group. Do we really need to lobby those representatives who are in favor of  HB 300, such as all of the co-sponsors?

Yes. Especially now, that the status of the bill is that we are working to assure that we have enough votes for passage, and with the budget taking all of the attention of the representatives. We need to keep this bill on the front burner. With a representative who is a co-sponsor, our goal is to thank them, and to ask them to get more involved by nudging their own colleagues in the House. We want them to be spokespersons for this legislation. For all other representatives, we need to be meeting with them face-to-face to talk about why this bill is important.

It isn’t true that all state representatives from the Pittsburgh area are firmly behind this bill. We may think of Pittsburgh as this big old center of progressives on the western side of the state, but in reality, we have a number of representatives who are more conservative within the larger “area” that we may think of when we say “Pittsburgh.” H- I do know where you live and so I know you live in Dan Frankel’s area. My suggestion to you personally, is to utilize your network of friends and colleagues across the state, to encourage them to set up a face-to-face meeting with their representative. My second suggestion is that since you have excellent communication skills, to consider helping those friends- go to meetings with them, and be able to talk about the key points of this bill. Your elected officials have an obligation to meet with their constituents, so any face-to-face meeting needs to include one or more constituents from that representative’s area, but it can include others as well.

What can be most useful is to help identify friends who live in areas where there is a representative who is either on the fence or who we think is opposed to HB 300. These folks really need to be lobbied by their constituents. Often, these representatives do not know enough about the bill, or have been mislead by false information by the bill’s opponents. Some may be close-minded people who don’t want equality for all of their constituents, but I think for the most part, when the facts are presented even opponents can get to the point of saying that no one should be discriminated against in employment and housing.

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?

PA Senator Argall Open to Civil Unions for PA

June 2nd, 2009 View Comments

From the linked article below:

Though he opposes same-sex marriage, Argall said he’s open to the idea of civil unions and other bills allowing gay or lesbian partners to share benefits such as medical insurance.

Same-sex marriage issue on Pa. stage |republicanherald.com | The Republican-Herald.

If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?