Twitter Hashtags Used to Spread Misinformation as Well as Useful
Twitter is understood by many as a tool to spread information, but we generally think of that as a positive thing- more information is always a good thing, right? What about when the message isn’t really a positive thing at all?
It isn’t news that in the Health Care Reform arena, conservatives have gone out of their way, to pass fear-based messages in an attempt to subdue the American public’s interest in reform. From the idea that the reform would kill old people, to the lie that reform would be used to deny coverage to Republicans, the stories have been fairly absurd, but have garnered some following with the less-than-aware.
Now, some are using Twitter hashtags to spread these types of messages out into specific communities in the hopes of splintering democratic support. Take the message below, which was sent out on Twitter with the hashtag of #lgbt, meaning that it should be of interest to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities The post linked to an opinion piece in The Hill which is anything but of interest to LGBT americans. It is so full of baloney… but then, so were all of the earlier claims.
When I messaged the poster about it, he asked me if I had read the article, as if reading it would illustrate this built-in discrimination against gays. Maybe this type of targeting messages isn’t new at all, but it is the first time I’ve seen it used this way.
My favorite bit of BS in it:
The left’s demand for government-run healthcare, the so-called “public option,” will leave gay and lesbian families completely and totally out. Gays, who currently are able to secure health insurance that provides for domestic partner benefits for their families, will find no such options when it comes to government-run healthcare. Worst, low-income gay and lesbian families, who can’t afford private insurance and will be forced by federal mandate into government-run healthcare, will be hit the hardest.
The left’s demand for government-run healthcare, the so-called “public option,” will leave gay and lesbian families completely and totally out. Gays, who currently are able to secure health insurance that provides for domestic partner benefits for their families, will find no such options when it comes to government-run healthcare. Worst, low-income gay and lesbian families, who can’t afford private insurance and will be forced by federal mandate into government-run healthcare, will be hit the hardest.
Gay and lesbian families are already totally left out in most places, or where they are able to cover their partners and families, the methods for that vary. For example, my partner is covered on my employer provided insurance, except that unlike my coverage, where my employer pays a part, I pay the entire amount for my partner. “Low-income gay and lesbian families” are less likely to be accepted as a family by local, state or the federal level under out current health care and assorted government systems. It isn’t like the health care reform will take away something that they already have.
All of the so-called discrimination is because of DOMA:
The Defense of Marriage Act, passed by Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support, and signed by a Democratic president — Bill Clinton — prohibits the extension of domestic partner healthcare benefits and denies recognition of any same-sex relationship. Indeed, even the Obama administration admitted that this legislation would bar the extension of domestic partner healthcare benefits.
But the editorial failed to mention that legislation has been introduced to repeal DOMA, and Obama’s comments were not about Health Care reform (and how DOMA would impact that) but about providing domestic Partner benefits to federal employees in general. Fear mongering, does this stuff really work?
Maybe on the general public, but within the LGBT community? I doubt it. Most are so used to being discriminated against, that to have someone from “The Hill” a space (either the physical space or the paper) which rarely if ever cared about LGBT issues or needs, suggest that we should worry is laughable at best, and pathetic.
Expanding government-run health insurance means expanding discrimination against gays – TheHill.com.
If you appreciate reading my posts, would you like to thank me with a coffee?




Recent Comments